Expired Pick Lists

Updated October 12, 2026

How the pick lists are built

The short version: we look for dead domains that the internet has not noticed are dead yet. People still type them, click to them and cite them. The lists rank that leftover attention.

The daily scan

Every day we take 1,585,405 .com and .net domains that appear in public popularity and citation datasets, and ask the registry about each one. Nearly all of them are alive and are discarded. What remains falls into three groups:

StatusWhat it meansWhat you can do
AvailableThe registry has no record of the domain. It is unregistered.Register it at any registrar for the normal fee.
DroppingPending delete. Nobody can renew it; it is released within five days.Place a backorder, or try to register it the moment it drops.
RedemptionExpired, but the old owner can still pay to restore it for about 30 days.Watch it. If it is not restored it moves to pending delete.

Domains that are merely suspended by their registrar are still owned, so they are never listed. The “drops by” date shown for a domain is the latest day it can stay in its current stage, counted from the first day we saw it there.

The evidence

SignalSourceWhat it tells you
Chrome visitorsChrome UX ReportReal people opened the site in Chrome often enough, within the last few weeks, for Google to include it. It is published as a rank bucket (top 1K … top 1M), not as a visitor count. This is the strongest signal we have.
Wikipedia readersWikimedia link and pageview dumpsHow many English Wikipedia articles still link to the domain, and how many times a day those articles are read. Busy articles keep sending a trickle of readers for years.
RankTranco listA 30-day average of several independent popularity rankings. Still being ranked after expiry means the domain was popular very recently.
Referring networksMajestic MillionHow many distinct networks host a link to the domain. Useful for search value, but the easiest signal to fake, so it carries the least weight.
Hacker NewsHN searchHow often the domain’s pages were submitted. A small bonus for tech sites.

The pick score

The score adds the evidence together, weighting each signal by how hard it is to fake and how directly it reflects human visitors. Chrome usage counts for most, Wikipedia readership next, then rank, then links. Each signal is on a logarithmic scale, so a domain cited by articles with 100,000 daily readers scores higher than one with 1,000, but not a hundred times higher.

To be listed at all, a domain needs at least one sign of human visitors: a place in the Chrome UX Report, or Wikipedia articles citing it that are read at least 100 times a day between them. Links and rankings alone are not enough, because both are routinely manufactured by link farms.

The score is a way to sort a long list. It is not a traffic forecast and it is not a valuation.

What gets filtered out

The filters are automatic and imperfect. Some junk gets through and some good names are removed.

What the numbers cannot tell you

Read this before you spend money.

Data sources and credit

This site would not exist without open data. Our thanks to the Chrome UX Report (Google), the Tranco list (Le Pochat et al.), the Majestic Million, Wikimedia dumps and pageview data, and the Hacker News search API. Registration status comes from the registry’s public DNS and RDAP services.